In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Scott Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I think we should resolve the abbr-accessibility "elephant in the
room",
once and for all, before introducing any new mis-uses of abbr. After
all, it was identified over a year ago...
And it could easily go unresolved for another year.
It could well do. For shame.
Can anyone here give an undertaking not to loose their sight, during
that time? Does everyone here think disability only happens to other
people?
Any resolution to abbr problems can be applied to hAudio in the
future just as easily as every other microformat already using abbr.
Yeah, who cares about cripples. What are they doing using our web,
anyway? Let 'em wait.
That shouldn't slow down hAudio progress. In this case, someone
wrote "P268T" as a long form of "4:46", when it should have been
"P286T". Typo aside, that follows established microformat use of
<abbr> and ISO 8601.
I didn't even notice the typo; "4:46", in plain English, is no more an
abbreviation of "P286T" than it is of "P268T".
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
