On 10/14/07, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes I did notice that you have done a lot of work already to support an > item design pattern or submicroformat > > On the Wiki Item has been tagged as Moribund? > > discussions on the list over the last few days certainly indicates that > an Item submicroformat may be an extremely important tool > > Is there a reason Item never became a proposal? and also can you see any > reasons why *Item* cannot be completed? > > Thanks > > Martin
I suspect it's marked moribund since there's been no activity in the last year. I personally think it's a great idea, especially since it's a refinement/distillation of what is already out there and think we should complete it. The reason it never became an official proposal is more complicated, mainly that unless you have a cadre of interested people willing to do the work ... and there's a lot ... it's pretty hard to individually push a complete uF through the process here. As there were several competing ideas at the time around uFs for "things", last year perhaps wasn't the time. Regards, etc... -- David Janes Founder, BlogMatrix http://www.blogmatrix.com http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
