In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Hello Andy > >On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 20:27 +0000, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> I think that providing an alternative to OL in that manner, not to >> mention encouraging people to use it by having it as an example in >> the >> spec, is no better then "p class="heading"> By which I meant ...than <p class="heading"> >I am not going to argue with you on that point I agree in principle, >but unlucky for us the "real world" is much different to the world we >are trying to create, you know as well as I that a lot of designers >still use tables for layouts, most are not interested in validating >their documents, or understand semantics beyond "web3.0"(yuck) or >"twine"(lol), I really don't think we should accord such bad behaviour credit by catering for it at the expense of good practise. >so hAudio has to fit in I don't think that's a given. >, in order to be adopted, this is why the compromise, allow authors to >publish hAudio in tables (If they so wish) and so making hAudio easier >to adopt. hAudio in tables is a separate issue to bad mark-up, Tables may well be valid, semantically-correct and the best way to mark up a page about number of audio recordings. The use of microformats in tables is itself an issue in need of further thought. For example (this is an illustrative question, not a proposal), should: <th class="fn" scope="row">Name</fn> indicate that each cell in that column is to be treated as an FN if there is, say, a vCard across that cell's row? If not, how else might that be achieved? -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory UK ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new