Definite +1 from me :o) > -----Original Message----- > From: Trustin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 31 October 2006 05:31 > To: mina-dev@directory.apache.org > Subject: Re: mina 1.0 and java5 > > +1 > > On 10/31/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > is there interest in an official mina 1.0 build not requiring the > > util.concurrent backport? > > > > this would be slightly more than what can be done by whacking the > > backport import prefixes.. all data structures that have > replacements > > in j.u.concurrent will be removed and replaced with their jdk-based > > counterparts. > > > > aside from Apache DS using MINA, I get the impression that > pretty much > > everyone else is on java5? > > > > -pete > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP key fingerprints: > * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E > * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6 >
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
