Hi Jean, >Sorry for the late reply, I have been away from home due to unexpected >family issues.
no problem. >for -e must be fairly limited. As I understand it, the only purpose of >the option is to cancel a previous -r, which is kind of a corner case. The ksh93 manpage documents it as such, yes. >Fair enough. I hope this minor incompatibility won't be a problem for >out customer. OK. Handling _that_ would be maximally tricky (escape from the getopts framework, etc). >> This will be in the next mksh release. > >Thank you very much. I have backported your work to mksh R50 as this is >what our product includes, and will send to our customer shortly for >testing. OK, wonderful, thanks! >Now that the print command supports option -e and it is documented, >it should also appear in the command synopsis. Good catch! I merged it, and while there, fixed another small bug. bye, //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt
