Just set recent snapshot in parallel to release. Next function works
properly in this version. Thank you.
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 05:02:28PM +0900, Masato Asou wrote:
> From: misc@abrakadabra.systems
> Subject: LLDB step over command
> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 21:58:31 +0300
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Im on 6.9 release amd64. Switched to clang and lldb since gcc and gdb are
> > not
> > in base anymore. My problem is during debugging for some functions
> > command "next/step-over" behaves like "step/step-in".
> >
> > example code (just for illustration purpose):
> > #include<stdlib.h>
> > #include<string.h>
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > int a = 5, b;
> > void *p = malloc(sizeof(int));
> > memcpy(p, (void *)&a, sizeof(int));
> > b = *(int *)p;
> > return b;
> > }
> >
> > compiled with:
> > cc -g -Weverything -ansi -pedantic -O0 -o moveint moveint.c
> >
> > below is the snippet from session where lldb goes into malloc instead of
> > step over it.
> > ...
> > -> 7 void *p = malloc(sizeof(int));
> > ^
> > 8 memcpy(p, (void *)&a, sizeof(int));
> > 9 b = *(int *)p;
> > 10 return b;
> > (lldb) next
> > Process 18050 stopped
> > * thread #1, stop reason = step over failed (Could not create return
> > address
> > breakpoint. Return address (0x43eae9c89bd) permissions not found.)
> > frame #0: 0x0000043eae9c8ad0 moveint`malloc
> > moveint`malloc:
> > -> 0x43eae9c8ad0 <+0>: movq 0x11c9(%rip), %r11
> > 0x43eae9c8ad7 <+7>: callq 0x43eae9c8a40
> > 0x43eae9c8adc <+12>: jmp 0x43eae9c8a32
> > 0x43eae9c8ae1 <+17>: pushq $0x4
> > ...
> >
> > How should I deal with this?
>
> I have same problem on my OpenBSD 6.9 release amd64 box. However, next
> command of lldb is working fine on my OpenBSD 6.9 current amd64 box.
>
> The lldb has been updated to 11.1.0 on OpenBSD current. Can you update
> to current your OpenBSD box by
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Serge.
> >
> --
> ASOU Masato
