On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:01:07AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 15:09:10 +0100, "mickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:02:32PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > > hmm, on Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:06:45PM +0100, mickey said that
> > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:13:29AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > > > > hmm, on Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:40:52PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
> > > > > > It means translation is stupid, but we keep doing it. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > it is not really the translation that got me worried
> > > > > (although wouldn't it be more consistent to use the n x 255 x 63
> > > > > version everywhere?) but the different number of sectors..
> > > > > thanks for the great explanation.
> > > >
> > > > who gives a flying fuck?
> > > > bios is using it's own geometry and we are using ours.
> > > > how about you ask those spammers to send dick measurements in meters?
> > >
> > > perhaps this could go into the faq?
> >
> > what? dick measurement techniques?
>
> And not long ago I wrote to the list that this list *is* nice and people
> don't get attacked unless they become obnoxious.
> Please thank you for proving me absolutely wrong.
> Jeez, you know more about how the bios and the OS report disk
> geometries and his enquiries annoy you? Please get over it.
>
> Sorry to everyone for also wasting more of this lists bandwidth.
you cannot read can you?
it does not matter what geometries are
as long as you do not change any yourself.
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
