On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 02:46:09PM +0100, Falk Brockerhoff wrote: > >And the output of the forwarding database with the unexpected nexthop of > >the local interface instead of the opsf-neighbor: > > > ># ospfctl sh fib > >flags: * = valid, O = OSPF, C = Connected, S = Static > >Flags Destination Nexthop > > C 195.140.212.0/24 link#22 > > I killed the ospfd-process and started it again, and the fib looks better: > > # ospfctl sh fib > flags: * = valid, O = OSPF, C = Connected, S = Static > Flags Destination Nexthop > *O 195.140.212.0/24 10.0.0.2 > > Hm, killing and restarting ospfd isn't the way I want to do it everytime > the state of the carp-interface changes :-) >
Hmm. For some reasons the carp route is not cleared correctly. I'll have a look at it. Btw. I think for your simple setup with two bgpd routers and one carped LAN network behind them does not need ospfd. Try to keep it simple until you know that you need ospf. -- :wq Claudio
