This is the type of thing that I feared when people said that we should allow the Muslim Brotherhood the right to their "Cultural Centers". I am not going to argue with anyone. I still worry about this. They are doing exactly what some of us feared that they would do and what they said that they would do. If anyone does want to argue I will not keep this going. It is just so insidious.
A conservative president would not welcome the Muslim Brotherhood. Even most democrats would not do so. What about proselytizing the terroristic form of the Muslim religion do we not understand? I guess it would seem to be plenty of people. This is absurd. I do not want my progeny to become violent psychopaths. This is really religion as part of the state with no separation. I am firm on that. Does anyone know just how many Mosques there are in the United States or even in this city? And how shutting down the internet. I read that there more than 50 terrorist's training camps within our borders. Casey Anthony was not guilty? Linda > >----- Forwarded Message ---- >From: Act for America <actforamer...@donationnet.net> >To: Carl and Linda Herd <linda.h...@sbcglobal.net> >Sent: Tue, July 5, 2011 1:29:53 PM >Subject: Obama admin embraces Muslim Brotherhood > > > >Visit our News page > > >Obama Administration Embraces the Muslim Brotherhood > >Meanwhile, our petition demanding reinstatement of Captain Fields passes >33,000 >signers. Have you signed yet? > > > >Dear Carl and Linda, > >Two seemingly unrelated actions are in fact very related: The Obama >administrating embracing the Muslim Brotherhood (see Frank Gaffney’s column >below) and the demotion and suspension of Tulsa police Captain Paul Fields. > > >In both instances, the Muslim Brotherhood is at the heart of the issue. The >Islamic center in Tulsa that held the “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day” is >tied >to Muslim Brotherhood front groups. > > >In both instances, government officials have made decisions to embrace the >Muslim Brotherhood. The Obama Administration decision is more obvious, but >when >the Tulsa police chief suspended Captain Fields the net effect was to send a >loud and clear message of appeasement to the Muslim Brotherhood’s front >organizations. > > >It’s bad enough that Captain Fields was ordered to attend an Islamic >proselytizing event. What makes it all the more damning is that the Islamic >Center is actively tied to the Muslim Brotherhood. > > >We are fewer than 7,000 signers from our goal of 40,000 for the Captain Fields >petition. If you have not yet done so, please sign the petition today and >forward it to everyone you know. With your help we can reach our goal this >week! > > >Soon we will announce the next action item for our campaign on behalf of >Captain >Fields. > > >________________________________ >The Tipping Point: Embracing the Muslim Brotherhood > >F R A N K J. G A F F N E Y, J R. > > > > >The Obama administration chose the eve of the holiday marking our Nation's >birth >to acknowledge publicly behavior in which it has long been stealthily engaged >to >the United States' extreme detriment: Its officials now admit that they are >embracing the Muslim Brotherhood (MB or Ikhwan in Arabic). That would be the >same international Islamist organization that has the destruction of the >United >States, Israel and all other parts of the Free World as its explicit >objective. > > >On Thursday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tried to downplay the >momentousness of this major policy shift by portraying it during a stopover in >Budapest as follows: "The Obama administration is continuing the approach of >limited contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood that have existed on and off for >about five or six years." In fact, as former federal prosecutor Andrew >McCarthy >points out in a characteristically brilliant, and scathing, dissection of this >announcement, Team Obama's official, open legitimation of the Brotherhood >marks >a dramatic break from the U.S. government's historical refusal to deal >formally >with the Ikhwan. > > >To understand why the Obama administration's embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood >is so ominous, consider three insights into the organization's nature and >ambitions: > > >First, here's the MB's creed: "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our >leader. The Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is >our highest hope." (Source: Husain Haqqani and Hillel Fradkin, "Islamist >Parties: Going Back to the Origins.") > > >Second, here's the Ikwhan's mission in America: > >"A kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization >from within, sabotaging its miserable house with their [i.e., Americans'] >hands >and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is >made victorious over all other religions." (Source: Muslim Brotherhood's >"Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goals of the Group," entered >into evidence by the Department of Justice in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation >terrorism-finance trial. Archived at the NEFA Foundation.) > > >Third, here are excerpts from the Muslim Brotherhood's "phased plan" for >accomplishing that mission: > > >Phase One: Discreet and secret establishment of leadership. >Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and >utilizing various public activities. It greatly succeeded in implementing this >stage. It also succeeded in achieving a great deal of its important goals, >such >as infiltrating various sectors of the Government. > >Phase Three: Escalation phase, prior to conflict and confrontation with the >rulers, through utilizing mass media. Currently in progress. > >Phase Four: Open public confrontation with the Government through exercising >the >political pressure approach. It is aggressively implementing the >above-mentioned >approach. Training on the use of weapons domestically and overseas in >anticipation of zero-hour. It has noticeable activities in this regard. > >Phase Five: Seizing power to establish their Islamic Nation under which all >parties and Islamic groups are united. (Source: Undated Muslim Brotherhood >Paper >entitled, "Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan." Archived at >Shariah: >The Threat to America.) > > >In short, the Muslim Brotherhood is deadly serious about waging what it calls >"civilization jihad" against the United States and other freedom-loving >nations >in order to secure their submission to the Islamic totalitarian >political-military-legal doctrine called shariah. The MB's goal in this >country >is to replace our Constitution with theirs, namely the Koran. And they regard >this task as one commanded by none other than Allah. (For more details on the >nature, ambitions and modus operandi of the Ikhwan, see the Team B II Report, >Shariah: The Threat to America). To this end, as Andy McCarthy notes in the >aforementioned essay, the MB's senior official, Supreme Guide Muhammad Badi, >has >effectively declared war on the United States. > > >Were there any doubt that legitimacy is what the Ikhwan is taking away from >this >gambit, consider this assessment from an expert in Islamic groups, Ammar Ali >Hassan, cited by Associated Press: "...The Brotherhood will likely try to >float >‘conditions' or ‘reservations' on any dialogue to avoid a perception that it >is >allowing the U.S. to meddle in Egypt's internal affairs. But in the end, the >talks will give a boost to the group, he said, by easing worries some in the >Brotherhood and the public have of a backlash if the Brotherhood becomes the >dominant player in Egypt. ‘Now the Muslim Brotherhood will not have to worry >[about] moving forward toward taking over power,' Hassan said." Unfortunately, >the U.S. government's dangerous outreach to the Ikhwan is not confined to >Egypt >but is systematically practiced inside the United States, as well. For >example: > > > > * Muslim-American organizations identified in court by the U.S. > government - >and, in many cases, by the Muslim Brotherhood itself - as MB fronts are >routinely cultivated by federal, state and local officials. Representatives of >homeland security, Pentagon, intelligence and law enforcement agencies >frequently meet with and attend functions sponsored by such groups. > > > * MB-associated individuals are sent as our country's "goodwill > ambassadors" to >foreign Muslim nations and communities. MB-favored initiatives to insinuate >shariah into the United States - notably, the Ground Zero Mosque and >shariah-compliant finance, conscientious objector status for Muslim servicemen >and stifling of free speech in accordance with shariah "blasphemy" laws - are >endorsed and/or enabled by official institutions. > > > * A blind eye is turned to the presence across the country of > shariah-adherent >mosques that incubate jihadism. A peer-reviewed study published last month in >Middle East Quarterly determined that 81% of a random sample of 100 mosques >exhibited such qualities - constituting an infrastructure for recruitment, >indoctrination and training consistent with the Brotherhood's phased plan. > > > * Under both Republican and Democratic administrations, individuals > with family >and other ties to the Muslim Brotherhood have actually given senior government >positions. The most recent of these to come to light is Secretary of State >Hillary Clinton's Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin (who also happens to be >former Rep. Anthony Weiner's wife). It seems a safe bet that, as Team Obama >legitimates Muslim Brotherhood organizations and groups overseas, it will feel >ever less constrained about further empowering their counterparts in the >United >States. If so, the MB will come to exercise even greater influence over what >our >government does and does not do about the threat posed by shariah, both abroad >and here. > > >The absolutely predictable effect will be to undermine U.S. interests and >allies >in the Middle East and further catalyze the Brotherhood's campaign to >insinuate >shariah in the United States and, ultimately, to supplant the Constitution >with >Islamic law. Consequently, the Obama administration's efforts to "engage" the >Muslim Brotherhood are not just reckless. They are wholly incompatible with >the >President's oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the >United >States" and the similar commitment made by his subordinates. > > >These officials' now-open embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood constitutes a >geo-strategic tipping point, one that must catalyze an urgent national debate >on >this question: Does such conduct violate their oath of office by endangering >the >Constitution they have undertaken to uphold? > > >At a minimum, such a debate would afford a much-needed opportunity to examine >alternatives to the administration's present course - as well as the real >risks >associated with that its intensifying pursuit. For instance, one of the most >astute American authorities on the Middle East in general and the Muslim >Brotherhood in particular, Dr. Michael Rubin of the American Enterprise >Institute, wrote in a posting at The American blog yesterday: > > >"Rather than embrace the Brotherhood, the Obama administration should be >seeking >to ensure that the group cannot dominate Egypt. Most analysts agree that the >Muslim Brotherhood is by far the best organized group in Egypt, but that it >only >enjoys perhaps 25 or 30 percent support. The secular opposition remains weak >and >fractured. If the Obama administration wishes to remain engaged in Egypt's >future and shape the best possible outcome for both U.S. national security and >the Egyptian people, it should be pushing for electoral reform to change >Egypt's >dysfunctional system to a proportional representation model in which the >secular >majority can form a coalition to check a Muslim Brotherhood minority for which >true democracy is anathema." > > >The same goes for the enemy within. Instead of relying upon - let alone hiring >- >Muslim Brotherhood operatives and associates, the United States government >should be shutting down their fronts, shariah-adherent, jihad-incubating >"community centers" and insidious influence operations in America. By >recognizing these enterprises for what they are, namely vehicles for >fulfilling >the seditious goals of the MB's civilization jihad, they can and must be >treated >as prosecutable subversive enterprises, not protected religious ones under the >U.S. Constitution. > > >Let the debate begin. > >This article can be found here: >http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p18757.xml > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Make sure you receive all of your messages from ACT for America. Add >actforamer...@donationnet.net to your address book as an approved email >sender. >If you found this message in your "Bulk" or "Spam" folder, please click the >"Not >Spam" button to notify your provider that these are emails you want to >receive. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >ACT for America >P.O. Box 12765 >Pensacola, FL 32591 >www.actforamerica.org > >ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively >organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network >in >America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic >action >that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and >the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical >Islam. >We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial >support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America >safer >and more secure. > > >The news items, blogs, educational materials and other information in our >emails >and on our website are only intended to provide information, news and >commentary >on events and issues related to the threat of radical Islam. Much of this >information is based upon media sources, such as the AP wire services, >newspapers, magazines, books, online news blog and news services, and radio >and >television, which we deem to be reliable. However, we have undertaken no >independent investigation to verify the accuracy of the information reported >by >these media sources. We therefore disclaim all liability for false or >inaccurate >information from these media sources. We also disclaim all liability for the >third-party information that may be accessed through the material referenced >in >our emails or posted on our website. > > >Do not respond to this e-mail for any reason. To discontinue your membership >automatically please, follow the link below. You are registered to receive >email >as Carl and Linda Herd at the following e-mail address: >linda.h...@sbcglobal.net. You must use the correct e-mail address to >discontinue >your membership. > > >________________________________ HOW CAN I TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ORGANIZATION? >Send a personalized version of this message to your friends. > >________________________________ HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR ORGANIZATION? >Click here to give an online donation. > >Discontinue your subscription. > > -- This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members. If you do not like what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave. If you leave, learn how to do this for yourself. If you do not, you will be here forever.
