On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:19:06AM -0800, GerdP wrote:
Hi Marko,
please check:
Marko Mäkelä wrote
* Different coordinates for the 13 old messages (as expected; this is
thanks to the higher precision)
I don't yet see a reason for different coordinates. Did you really compare
the output one program execution?
Or did you use a different program for the "old" messages?
I did 2 comparisons with the output from 2 runs:
With mkgmap/trunk r2916
With mkgmap/branches/high-prec-coord r2930 and your patch
First, I compared the output of trunk to the output of branch, using the
finland.osm.pbf from Geofabrik dated today, 02:16 UTC.
There were 2 differences:
(a) Variation of the coordinates in the 13 old-style messages
(b) Addition of 10 new-style messages
This was to be expected.
What was not expected was the difference 13 vs. 10. To diagnose it,
I performed another comparison within the output of the patched branch.
Many of the "old" messages had direct counterparts in the "new"
messages, but some "new" messages for "old" messages were missing, and
some were extra (only "new" message for the way, no "old" one).
In my previous message, I listed the OSM way IDs for both cases. I fixed
one error (for one extra "new" message) in the OSM database, but I left
the others intact, so that we will have some errors in the next
finland.osm.pbf to check against.
Marko
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
