Hi Gerd, Yes, that's correct. The patch will have no effect until the bounds are updated to OSM data that's newer than 27 April 2015.
Thanks, Ben On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Gerd Petermann < gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > thanks for the patch. Just to make sure: > The additional rules have no effect until one has updated bounds, > so I can commit that without causing trouble, right? > > Gerd > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:43:03 +0200 > From: b...@bagu.org > To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap:city empty in large cities > > Hi Gerd, > > I was a bit wrong with my analysis of Ottawa and Toronto. Toronto and > Ottawa should be admin level 8 and the 'cities' within Toronto and Ottawa > should be admin level 9 (as Orleans was already tagged). I've corrected the > labelling issues in OSM but I didn't add the missing 'city' boundaries > inside Ottawa. > > I've attached a patch that corrects address search for Toronto and Ottawa. > You'll need updated bounds data for this to work but I have confirmed that > it's working. It would be nice to get this included in mkgamp. > > Thanks, Ben > > > _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
