Hi Ticker,
Thanks for your heads up on the syntax!
During last night I started thinking, how tightly this feature must be
connected to routing.
Some very basic tests this morning, changing the primary type definition
(0x10e05) to a routable type, hence seemed to make it work. Fortunately,
on the other hand, not even mkgmap option --route seems to be required
nevertheless; appreciated, because I use a separate map(layer) for
routing ;-)
Will follow up on this more thoroughly later and may revisit the topic,
if the relief was premature ;-)
Cheers, Felix
On 06.03.23 10:17, Ticker Berkin wrote:
Hi Felix
Your syntax looks correct, but, given that the example WAY you quote
is a private driveway, I'd suspect the settings of hgh:*, being set to
meet these conditions for the way in question and the road and wall
Ticker
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 22:35 +0100, Felix Herwegh wrote:
Hi,
I seem to have difficulties to figure out the correct lines syntax to
address semi- or un-connected lines.
Using
hgh:surface=Race & hgh:WayRel=yes & hgh:WayAcc != yes
{set mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=none;
set mkgmap:set_unconnected_type=none}
[0x10e05 level 0]
still assigns 0x10e05 to roads like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815829699, although this is the
only type definition assigning 0x10e05. Same for e. g. "set
mkgmap:set_semi_connected_type=0x39" instead of "none". (Using Mkgmap
version 4896 atm)
Since documentation is quite sparse on this: Can somebody please help
me out?
Thanks, Felix
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
