I've updated indy_mock for this change and for the insertArguments name change.
http://github.com/jruby/indy_mock/tree/master On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:50 AM, John Rose<[email protected]> wrote: > In response to comments on [email protected] about our > proposed Java language changes, I am changing the implicit methods of > InvokeDynamic.foo and MethodHandle.invoke to include a static > declaration of "throws Throwable". This aligns with the reality that > there is no framework of static checking for throws and catches that > applies to those calls; they are essentially dynamic and can throw > anything. It allows the Java language to incorporate those new > constructs much more accurately (with respect to the conventions of > the Java language). > > I have retrofitted the code internal to the Sun JDK (from meth.patch, > etc.), and the exercise consisted of pasting in a bunch of "throws > Throwable" declarations in places where they did no harm (other than > to look a little ugly). The bytecodes are essentially unchanged; > there are no new catches or throws. For more information on the > language issues (and subsequent discussion, if any) please see coin-dev: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-June/001954.html > > Please let me know if there are any other problems with this change, > for users of JSR 292. > > -- John > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
