On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: Hi, > > Please explain, the guide appears to recommend -w as a useful > > diagnostic technique (and the "Command Line Switches (-w, -T, > > etc)" section says -w works). > The guide is correct. -w in the shebang line is equal to 'local $^W=1' for > the file scope. and it does have an effect (for the file it's defined in). Stas is right, I mixed up -w and -T :-((( Sorry for bothering you guys... Bye, remco /----------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Remco Schaar | | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/ South Park meets Linux: - "Oh my God, they killed init!" - "You bastards!"
- Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict ed phillips
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict remco
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict G.W. Haywood
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Paul DuBois
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Stas Bekman
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Simon_Wilcox
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Simon_Wilcox
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict lporcano
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict lporcano
- RE: Apache::Registry() and strict Geoffrey Young
- RE: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker