On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, martin langhoff wrote: > brian moseley wrote: > > > (speaking as the author of a proprietary mod_perl > > webmail...) > > > > DO IT!! > > my fear is that writing it as a mod_perl app, it'd be terribly niche, > and we wouldn't get it rolling. I'd rather write a bunch of modules, > that can be called from a CGI or a templating system. > > Then those modules can be reused on other apps. you'd be silly if you didn't layer your application this way. > Plus, we should be writing that is pure-CGI compatible -- y'know, we > won't be needing any actual mod_perl hooks, and CGI-compat means is more > usable under other configs, and keeps you honest. up to you. if i was doing it i'd be using ao and mason :)
- RFC: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? George Sanderson
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? Jeremy Howard
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? Leon Brocard
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module... Wim Kerkhoff
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module? martin langhoff
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... martin langhoff
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apac... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apac... clayton cottingham
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache module... Perrin Harkins
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apache mo... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apac... Ričardas Čepas
- Re: Email (mod_perl) ... Michael
- Re: Email (mod_perl) Apac... Robin Berjon
- Re: Email (mod_perl) ... brian moseley
- Re: Email (mod_pe... Robin Berjon
- backtick behavior Doug Brewer
- Re: backtick beha... Joshua Chamas