On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:23:32PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's a README.Versions file with the mod_ssl package, but this is all it
> has at the end of it:
>
> 23-Jan-2001 2.8.0 1.3.17 0.9.3-0.9.6
> 03-Mar-2001 2.8.1 1.3.19 0.9.3-0.9.6
> 30-Mar-2001 2.8.2 1.3.19 0.9.3-0.9.6
> 04-May-2001 2.8.3 1.3.19 0.9.3-0.9.6a
> 20-May-2001 2.8.4 1.3.20 0.9.3-0.9.6a
>
> (The figures are the release dates, mod_ssl, Apache and openssl versions).
>
> 2.8.5 was released on 16th October, and openssl 0.9.6c was released on 21st
> December, hence my statement that it should work with 0.9.6b or 0.9.6c.
>
> Unless Ralf can say otherwise, it looks like 2.8.5 should build with 0.9.6.
>
I should think so too (I think that I have seen somebody use those versions).
At least recent changes in mod_ssl has been minimal and just following the
changes in apache.
There are two things to note:
1. openssl should be upgraded to at least 0.9.6b for security reasons
2. compiling and configuring a seperate openssl specifically for use with
mod_ssl using the config option no-thread will improve the performance
of mod_ssl
vh
Mads Toftum
--
With a rubber duck, one's never alone.
-- "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
