On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:56:02AM -0500, Brad Lhotsky wrote: > but the idea is to extend the module using the /proc > filesystem (hence the name space) > > 2) Is 'Linux::ForkControl' a decent name for this module?
Other operating systems have /proc interfaces. (Perhaps not identical to Linux but some are probably supportable). Why not use the Proc:: namespace? Proc::ForkControl But aren't ther similar modules already? Why add a new module instead of extending an exisiting one? Tim.
