* Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-17 19:20]: > Question: Consider the point of view of the author of a module > that subclasses your module; such a module could well add > further named params for its additional functionality -- is it > more useful for the constructor in the superclass to store > 'unknown' named params in the object or not?
Depends on whether that class wants to define additional defaults. If so, it canât just defer to the superclass. Regards, -- Aristotle
