Andy Armstrong wrote:
But I like neither the name nor the interface. How about this:
package BigApp::Report;
use subclass qw(..::Utils Create Publish);
# loads BigApp::Utils, BigApp::Report::Create,
BigApp::Report::Publish
"subclass" would imply more OO semantic than I'd like, as the
module just loads others modules, but I agree it's a better name
than "relative" and I can't find a better one.
Also agreeing for the API change. I know I was pondering about
using ".." but can't remember why I didn't.
Would it also do
use relative [to => 'My::Big::Namespace'] => qw( This That
Munger::Fast Munger::Precise );
It can easily do that. The problem is more the name. In this case,
"use relative to ..." works well. But in y original example, "use
subclass" works better. Maybe I should provide both modules then.
--
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
Close the world, txEn eht nepO.
