On 10/6/07, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I always hesitate to suggest Aristotle is mistaken - it's not a > common occurrence - but I really think 'subclass' is wrong. As you > said this is an extension to the semantics of use that has (I > presume) nothing to do with any inheritance relationship the modules > may have with each other.
++ > I quite like 'relative' to be honest. And I like the idea of the > module. I'll use it immediately when you release it, thanks. I agree with "relative" vs "subclass" -- and it does seem to be a very useful module for anything with many classes and subclasses. David
