On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:52:56AM -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 23:29 +0000, Tim Bunce wrote: > > Re the choice of name for the low level library... > > > > Lib::Memcached > > Lib::memcached > > Lib::libmemcached > > > > My preference is for Lib::libmemcached because it emphasises the name > > of the library that it's a wrapper for. > > No shortage of opinions in this thread, but I thought I'd throw mine in > anyway; Memcached::libmemcached. This name, to me, implies that it's a > Memcached interface that uses libmemcached. It doesn't say "raw" or > anything, but the "lib" part strongly implies that. > > YMMV JHMO :)
You're right on both counts Jonathan... No shortage of opinions in this thread, and Memcached::libmemcached is a great name. Sold! Thanks Jonathan, and thanks to everyone who contributed. Tim.
