On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:31:17PM +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote: > On 28 Jul 2008, at 15:28, Ken Williams wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> What are your ideas about this? Should blead test results be separated >>> from the other results? >> >> Wholeheartedly, yes. It's useful to get the reports on blead, but >> probably not so useful for people who just want to cruise through >> reports to see whether the module will work for them - they may not >> even usually be aware that they're looking at a blead test. > > > I'd expect that the main audience for tests run against blead are Perl 5 > core developers and the developers of the module itself. There seems to me > to be little need to pollute the public test results with blead tests at > all.
At best publicising those results is harmless. I'm always happy to receive smoke reports against blead (and any other version except those that are below the minimum specified version) but I can't imagine them being of any use to anyone other than me, and possibly p5p when we are coming up to a release. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
