On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Hans Dieter Pearcey < hdp.perl.module-auth...@weftsoar.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 10:55:44PM +0300, Burak Gürsoy wrote: > > I think M::B has a clean and understandable interface while EU::MM is > > archaic (yes I know I didn't say something new). > > Any current argument about Perl installation tools is, as far as I can > tell, > primarily a battle between Module::Build and Module::Install, with EUMM on > a > stretcher by the sidelines. Pitting M::B against EUMM makes your argument > neither fair nor compelling. > For the average simple module that's just a pm file or two, EUMM is the least painful solution. It comes with every version of Perl that a user might possibly have, and it works the same in each of those Perl versions. It may be clunky and lack many desirable fetures, but it works just fine in most cases.
