Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Linda W wrote:
The assertion was that such a thing does not. It is is incumbent
upon you, who want to refute that
assertion to provide at least 1 example to disprove the general
assertion. Claiming it is a research
opportunity (because you don't know of any), is what i would expect of
the average person cannot refute my stated position. Is that your
final answer? ;-)
Or would you like to get serious?
Intel's icc is available for Linux (for x86 and x86_64, I assume)
Sun's compiler is available for Linux (just for x86 and x86_64, I think)
I've used lcc on Linux
I've not tried clang on Linux
That's 4 without trying, all of which I believe can be used in some cases
without payment.
Nicholas Clark
---
I have tried to get a hold of icc, you had to be a famous developer
or pay money -- I wanted to try it because it was said to do a much
better job of optimizing than the gnu compiler...
Somehow I don't know that your experience in getting free use of
compilers is typical,
I wasn't aware Sun's compiler was available, unencumbered from sun and
haven't heard of lcc/clang
will have to investigate them.
" did say:" I didn't ask for an exhaustive list -- even one compiler
that produces as good as [code] and supports 32/64 bit linux and windows..."
Do any besides gnu have 64-bit supp0rt on Windows?
