On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, David Nolan wrote: > He really should be using at least mon-1-1-0pre3 there werw a couple > significant bugs in pre1, and there have been a couple minor fixes since > then. Jim, if I tag the current code as mon-1-1-0pre4 and > mon-client-1-1-0pre3 can you put up tarballs of both of those, and maybe of > mon-contrib as well? If you don't have the time I can put up images > somewhere else.
ok sure, and i guess we should just fork it and call the branch 1.2, or 2.0. the head trunk we can begin calling 1.3 or 2.1, following the "odd #s devel, even #s stable" paradigm. i can take care of that and the updates to the web page and other related stuff sometime within the next week. _______________________________________________ mon mailing list mon@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
