David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: >> So, let's put this to the test: >> >> 1) Should Mongrel support a larger set of default mime types? > > I'm strongly in favor of this. Especially for core defaults like xml, > atom, and rss. It would mean that Rails page caching would Just Work > even for these common caching types.
Could you explain this? Mongrel is very unlikely to serve cached pages. That's usually handled by apache/lighty. I ran into this the other day and had to adjust my apache rewrite rules to look for cached .xml files rather than just .html files. Jeroen _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
