Ok, I understand. I should have written managed "ICU" ;) I understand that this is a new mono implementation of collation for globalization features.
So, mono will abandon icu4c, somewhere in the nearest future? rafi -----Original Message----- From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:45 PM To: Rafael Mizrahi Cc: Ilya Kharmatsky; mono-devel mailing list Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support No, no, I mean, old icu4c stuff ;-) Atsushi Eno Rafael Mizrahi wrote: > Atsushi, > WOW, managed ICU, > Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU > implementation ? > > rafi > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi > Eno > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM > To: Ilya Kharmatsky > Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation > (CompareInfo) support > > Hi Ilya, > > >>Great news! Thank you! > > > Thank you too, for all your help on it :-) > > >>Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare > > results > >>to >>"old" and may be MS.Net performance results? > > > Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono, > but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will > have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is > what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code. > > But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and > managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get > icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the > latest code works fine). > > Atsushi Eno > > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list