On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 16:19 -0700, Graydon Hoare wrote: > Bruce Stephens wrote: > > > Well, an obvious alternative would be to provide those two operations > > as lua functions. How portable is stat as a command? > > Yes, I'd much prefer writing stat() and readlink() lua functions. Both > functions are in SUSv3 and will be much faster than spawning a subprocess.
Won't these be somewhat non-portable, such as to windows? I thought monotone proper (as opposed to, say, extensions you can put in monotonerc) was supposed to be the same on all platforms, are we loosening that? Tim -- Free (experimental) public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
