Jack Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:41:33PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote: > >> How do you avoid a signature? Doesn't each revision still want at >> least one signed cert asserting that a changelog belongs to that >> revision? > > Yes, but here that signed cert would be identical to the revision > cert itself.
Ah, there isn't a revision cert. Revisions just are. [...] _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
