Brian May wrote: > As there any references on how policy branches will solve these > problems?
Whatever exists is on the wiki but I'm not sure whether there's a nice list of requirements or anything. The *one* nice thing about subversion branches is that they have a life-cycle. You can create a branch, which can later be renamed (through the normal svn copy-it-to-a-new-name-and-delete-the-old-one technique) and when you're done with it it can be deleted. However the project policy stuff works out I certainly hope that a similar branch life-cycle will be possible. I actually wonder if this is where we should be starting with the policy stuff, since it's a feature that everyone seems to want, myself included. i.e. suppose we build in some sort of support for branch life-cycle support and punt on the permissions stuff for a while, if that's even possible. I don't think there's really very much going on with the project policy stuff at the moment though. There are some ideas floating around but not much else. I didn't follow the discussions at the summit all that closely though so I don't know where they ended up. Cheers, Derek _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel