On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Thomas Keller <m...@thomaskeller.biz> wrote:
> * #20447: mtn diff <filename> fails inside of a renamed directory
> -> net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.20447-dscherger
> -> @Derek: whats your plan here? Is this reviewable?
>
I spent most of the day working on this and made some big changes
(reimplementing diff in terms of rosters rather than csets) but they didn't
actually fix the problem, which turns out to be somewhat complicated. I was
out for a long drive today and spent quite a lot of time thinking about it.
I have some ideas but I'm not yet sure if they'll work out or not. I'll
follow up with another email explaining the details.
> * #12773: show which branch a tag belongs to
> -> net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.12273-dscherger
> -> Patch looks cool, a test would be nice though. Wrt space issues,
> we could shorten the revision to gain additional space - I think
> the chance of finding two partial tagged revisions which can be
> completed to two different full revision ids is rather low.
> -> points: 5 to Derek (if you add a test :)
>
OK, adding a test should be easy. Do we have something to produce short
revision ids or should I just grab the first N chars or something?
> * #13604: need 'undelete' ('undrop'?)
> -> net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.13604-stephen_leake
> -> patch looks largely cool, some minor objections:
> "revert = not undrop;" - is the "not" operator portable?
> "bool undrop" function argument - an enum would be cool :)
> -> possible issue left: undrop does not work correctly when
> called on a dropped directory without --recursive. It still
> re-creates all childs of the directory, while one would assume
> that only the directory itself is recreated (and all the other
> files keep dropped)
> -> points: 5 to Stephe (if the remaining issues are sorted out)
>
I'm somewhat curious about this one but I haven't looked at the bug or the
fixes yet. Is undrop/undelete somehow different from revert or is this just
a command alias?
Other than that I'm quite happy with the results. We've closed many bugs
> and I think we should do that again some time in the future to bring
> down the bug count even more.
>
Agreed. I personally find having a few people around working at the same
time is quite motivating.
Cheers,
Derek
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
