On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:20:06 -0600 (CST) Dave Rolsky <auta...@urth.org> wrote:
> So with that in mind, maybe the flag needs to be more specific, like > "-strict-constructor". > > We could also offer a catchall "-all-strict-i-mean-it" flag (with a > better name) that would be explicitly documented as something that > could add more strictness later. Personally, I like the -flag => [qw/some options here/] syntax. That would let us specify everything we want. That way -strict could be a gateway to all sorts of pedantry. -- Nicholas Perez XMPP/Email: n...@nickandperla.net http://search.cpan.org/~nperez/ http://github.com/nperez
