Ian, You brought up David Icke as a dismissal point to any opposition of zeitgeist. For if David Icke dismisses zeitgeist, well, then this opposition is low value for David Icke is not credible. Well, if you knew that David Icke was also used as a source for zeitgeist what might you have thought. I guess if I use your line of argumentation, then zeitgeist is not credible for David Icke contributed to zeitgeist. So, that was pretty much your only line of argumentation that could have been a good foundation to ward off any opposition to zeitgeist and now I find David Icke is a contributor to zeitgeist so that pretty much rids your argument. Sorry, come up with something more debatable:
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/sources.htm woods Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
