Ok I compiled lame 3.61 with DJGPP and I also
compiled it with MSVC++ 5 SP3. I encoded the exact same file with the same
options but I used GNU diff and it said the the files differed. Is this
because the DOS version input is handled by libsndfile and the Win32 version is
not? Both resulting mp3s were 5,004,520 so I am really baffled as to why they
would differ. I was also amazed to see that the Win32 version is actually a
little bit faster the linux version I compiled as well.
Any insights?
Win32 Ver.
C:\audiograbber>lame -h -k -b 192 6.wav LAME version 3.61 (www.sulaco.org/mp3) GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic model version 0.75. Encoding 6.wav to 6.wav.mp3 Encoding as 44.1 kHz 192 kbps stereo MPEG1 LayerIII file ( 7.3x) Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated | play/CPU | ETA 7982/ 7982(100%)| 0:03:59/ 0:03:59| 0:03:59/ 0:03:59| 0.8735| 0:00:00 DOS Ver.
C:\audiograbber>doslame -h -k -b 192 6.wav 6.mp3 LAME version 3.61 (www.sulaco.org/mp3) GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic model version 0.75. Input handled by libsndfile (www.zip.com.au/~erikd/libsndfile) Encoding 6.wav to 6.mp3 Encoding as 44.1 kHz 192 kbps stereo MPEG1 LayerIII file ( 7.3x) Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated | play/CPU | ETA 7982/ 7982(100%)| 0:04:21/ 0:04:21| 0:04:21/ 0:04:21| 0.8016| 0:00:00 |
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] What is going on? Joshua Bahnsen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] What is going on? Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] What is going on? Mathew Hendry
- Re:[MP3 ENCODER] What is going on? Piter B.