Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?)

[David Balazic]

Zia Mazhar wrote:
> 
> > But depending on how slow this will actually be, it maybe not always be
> > desired, so I'm not sure if this should make the difference between a
> > --quality 8 or --quality 9 (9 being the maximum) option, if you know what
> > I mean.
> 
> I think a different switch should be fixed for this, like -eh [extra high
> quality].

But isn't --quality just a more detailde -h ?

--quality 0 --> no -h option
--quality 6 --> -h
--quality 9 --> your -eh option

and some in between 

david balazic
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )