Hi Ross,
as LAME 3.80 is the CVS version, may I ask you:
which version of LAME 3.80 did you compare with LAME 3.70?
Robert
Ross Levis schrieb am Sam, 15 Apr 2000:
> If anyone is interested,VBR is now more spread over the bitrates. Here is a partial
>frame analysis of a song (all encoded with -h -mj ). I included -V3 analysis to
>obtain a closer average
> bitrate. Some -V tuning is obviously needed. I guess the better lossless
>compression is having an effect.
>
> v3.70: (-V4)
> 64 - 1 - 0.0%
> 80 - 76 - 0.6%
> 96 - 1106 - 9.0%
> 112 - 5943 - 48.6%
> 128 - 3348 - 27.4%
> 160 - 982 - 8.0%
> 192 - 489 - 4.0%
> 224 - 191 - 1.6%
> 256 - 76 - 0.6%
> 320 - 10 - 0.1%
> Average bitrate: 124.6
>
> v3.80: (-V3)
> 64 - 18 - 0.1%
> 80 - 343 - 2.8%
> 96 - 2821 - 23.1%
> 112 - 2858 - 23.4%
> 128 - 2587 - 21.2%
> 160 - 2570 - 21.0%
> 192 - 634 - 5.2%
> 224 - 242 - 2.0%
> 256 - 106 - 0.9%
> 320 - 42 - 0.3%
> Average bitrate: 129.1
>
> v3.80: (-V4)
> 64 - 58 - 0.5%
> 80 - 1771 - 14.5%
> 96 - 3709 - 30.3%
> 112 - 2859 - 23.4%
> 128 - 2075 - 17.0%
> 160 - 883 - 7.2%
> 192 - 557 - 4.6%
> 224 - 174 - 1.4%
> 256 - 89 - 0.7%
> 320 - 35 - 0.3%
> Average bitrate: 115.3
>
> Ross.
>
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage: http://linux.unixcity.de/catwalk/index.html
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
