> I forget why the -B option was added, but it should not be > used under normal circumstances. > It was added because there are some decoder chips wich can't handle more than 192k frames. For (strange) cases like -b128 -B 128, why not made lame using cbr instead of vbr? Regards, -- Gabriel Bouvigne - France [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 12138873 MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Joshua Bahnsen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Gabriel Bouvigne
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Joshua Bahnsen
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Jason Antony
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Ivo
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR code Mark Taylor
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Steve Schow
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new VBR c... Don Melton