Takehiro Tominaga
Wed, 04 Oct 2000 19:12:47 -0700
> Am I wrong or has the file quantize-pvt.c changed to quantize_pvt.c > (and the header file as well)? Why was this done? As Mark said, that is because Borland C could not treat the "-" in filename. > Wait 'til you see v3.88. You've got a big surprise coming to you :) > I agree it probably wrong to use GNU make only makefiles. and I say I can't make a Makefile for too much architecture. I can check only GNU system. cannot make it for amiga, OS/2, solaris, OpenBSD, BSDI, NetBSD, Windows, MSDOS, OSF/1, and of course RISCOS. so if you want to make the lame on these environment, > to maintain an own Makefile for RISC OS. And I have to keep track on > file name changes. So I wondered why such a change was made. Or am I > wrong and the file name got mixed up on my end you should keep track with filename and command name of CC/MAKE/... that's because this is opensource. no warrantry is here. YOU are the maintainer and developper. another point: I think configure.in and Makefile.am are good thing, but for some people, maybe they are not good. anyone have ideas ? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] // may the source be with you! -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )