I wouldn't worry about it. It is possible I overwrote my timings file and that the times are not affected after all.
On 9 January 2012 17:56, Jason <ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com> wrote: > On Sunday 08 January 2012 11:30:05 Bill Hart wrote: >> I decided to try the FFT without addsub_n and it seems to actually go >> consistently about 3% faster, which is totally mysterious. So I have >> removed it from the two files it is defined in: > > > Thats very strange , I assume this is on a K10 , what kind of sizes are we > talking about > >> >> ifft_mfa_truncate_sqrt2.c >> ifft_truncate_sqrt2.c >> >> As sumdiff_n seems to be defined for all platforms as far back as the >> MPIR 2.1 series (even if it is not explicitly exported), I can just >> extern this in my flint code (and of course it won't be a problem in >> mpir). >> >> So the fft should build on all systems now. >> >> Bill. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
