According to the Independent Media website (www.minneapolis.indymedia.org)
the city is re-charging ISAG protesters whose cases had been dismissed in
November (apparently the ones that were dropped by the judge because of "no
probable cause"). So are they hoping for a different judge? Trying to
make extra work for the protester's lawyers?
It seems as though the City Attorney's office must have some
responsibilities other than conducting a war of attrition with protest
groups. So are they hiring extra staff, working lots of overtime, or
letting their other normal duties slide?
Rosalind Nelson
Bancroft
