On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 05:19:38AM -0600, Peter Bigot wrote: > Since I'm here, though, I expect that issues with a pure upstream build > should be raised on the official gcc or binutils mailing lists. I > recommend first trying it with the pre-built toolchains available from TI, > as there may be changes that have not yet been integrated upstream.
TI is still at 4.8 so large model simply isn't there :D Probably -mlarge is not enough 'mature' for doing work... LTO does even crazier things (even in small) like junking interrupt handlers unless you put them as extern in the linker script... after all they are not called, so they are "obviously" dead code :D And the interrupt attributes warns for vectors after 31 (only a spurious warning, the code works) Anyway I opened a bug on the gcc report system; I even devised a two liner which reproduces the issue, so at least they can look at it easily. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
