Since I haven't seen a response, I've gone ahead and made
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63953 to record the absence of
the FR5xx/6xx MCUs from the hard-coded list in upstream gcc.
Peter
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Peter Bigot <big...@acm.org> wrote:
> Just noticed that integer multiplication is broken in upstream msp430-elf
> on msp430fr5969, apparently because gcc is hard-coding the list of MCUs and
> deciding which hardware multiplier to use based on that. None of the FR5
> chips are in any of those hard-coded lists. Interestingly, some FR2/FR4
> ones are listed.
>
> It does work if you explicitly add '-mhwmult=f5series' but the whole point
> of -mmcu=foo is to set the correct flags for device foo.
>
> This is a really lousy design choice. TI folks: we had the toolchain
> fully decoupled from the device list with msp430mcu four years ago in
> mspgcc, allowing the set of supported devices to be updated without
> breaking the toolchain.
>
> Why was this solution chosen?
>
> Peter
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
