Thanks to all who replied. I appreciate the sanity check!
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jason Sandys <ja...@sandys.us> wrote: > KISS**** > > ** ** > > Assuming you have one DP for every one of those locations, then yes, this > is perfect.**** > > ** ** > > There are various reason to potential add or change this up, but keeping > it simply like this is generally the best route.**** > > ** ** > > J**** > > ** ** > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Ryan > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:32 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Boundaries and Boundary Groups**** > > ** ** > > That's what we do and it works well. **** > > On Sep 17, 2013 10:22 AM, "Jeff Poling" <jeffpol...@yahoo.com> wrote:**** > > This is one of those questions for which I feel I should know the answer > but am having a hard time wrapping my brain around. In CM12, how do I > determine the number of boundary groups I need? I've read > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg712679.aspx but it does not > seem to give any recommendations or clues for how to determine the number > of boundary groups needed.**** > > **** > > Right now, I am using the boundary group only for content and not site > assignment. I have 8 remote sites that I am migrating from CM07. My > current thinking is to create one boundary group that contains the AD site > boundaries for each remote site. Does that make sense?**** > > **** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > **** > > Jeff**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > >
