Thanks for all the replies. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: July-19-16 3:39 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers?
Been running all virtual since about 2011. 72k clients, CAS + 3 Primaries. So happy to be moving to a single site in a couple weeks! Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Burke, John Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:13 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: [mssms] Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers? Hi folks, We got a little push back against going physical and perhaps my thinking is out of date. In the past we have gotten burned by I/O on virtual servers when we had a primary virtual server. Would you folks say it’s ok to have virtual servers for primary and secondary sites now a days? The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
