Hey, it makes MS more profitable, that is all that matters,. Same with the forced advertising in a corporate OS you pay millions for Same as with the cloud Same as with everything
Screw you, suck it up. lol On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Murray, Mike <mmur...@csuchico.edu> wrote: > I’ve been told “get used to it” on the patch management list. Not good > enough. I think this is ridiculous. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Roland Janus > *Sent:* Monday, August 15, 2016 4:08 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* AW: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a > disasterous way > > > > 1+ > > > > If they include such updates, like 3170455 which we also excluded, that’s > certainly going the mess up things.. > > > > *Von:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *Im Auftrag von *Miller, > Todd > *Gesendet:* Montag, 15. August 2016 22:42 > *An:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Betreff:* [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a > disasterous way > > > > https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/windowsitpro/2016/08/15/further- > simplifying-servicing-model-for-windows-7-and-windows-8-1/ > > > > Wow, this could be a disaster. > > > > We have had 4 or 5 cases in the last 12 months where we have had to delay > the installation of a security update so that applications could be > modified to work with updates. In a couple of cases, one ongoing, > Microsoft has released a security update, then acknowledged a bug in that > update and released a fix several months later. We currently have > KB3170455 denied in our environment because it breaks point – and –print > driver installation. In the new world, I will need to decide which is > worse – no security updates for 3 months, or break printing for all > non-admin users. Currently I can decide to pull or hold an individual > patch, but it looks like that option is being removed from Windows 7 and > 8. This comes at a time where it seems like patch quality has hit a > rough patch, making this decision more troubling. > > > ------------------------------ > > Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by > the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is > intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, > and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or > destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email > sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or > regulation. Thank you. > ------------------------------ > > > > > >
