I like it.

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thinking about this more, it may be better to utilize the Application
> Method.  That way I can chain the Dependencies in the proper order.
> Otherwise, I'd have to craft the SUG's accordingly, deploy them and wait
> for compliance, and then deploy the next one.
>
>
>    1. .NET 4.6.2
>    2. WMF 5.1
>    3. WUA Update
>    4. Servicing Stack
>    5. Convenience Roll-up
>    6. March Rollup
>    7. Start ADR
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So, I created a SUG with the Servicing Stack Updates (Which was
>> superseded with a newer one) and the July WUA.  I then created another SUG
>> with the Convenience Rollup.  Can I deploy both of these at the same time
>> or should I do the first one, once I hit good compliance then deploy the
>> Rollup?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Are your classifications correct in your SUP settings?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Shane Alexander <
>>> shane_alexan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Update regarding importing Convenience Rollup Update KB3125574 into
>>>> WSUS, and then sync'ing expecting to see it in ConfigMgr SUP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It imports OK to WSUS, but doesn't seem to sync across into ConfigMgr
>>>> SUP.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was expecting it would just like KB2775511, as per below link.
>>>>
>>>> https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/michaelgriswold/2013/03/
>>>> 13/kb2775511-deployment-for-the-sccm-admin/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However have just done this for KB3125574, but cannot see it.
>>>>
>>>> Did same steps for KB2775511, which I can see.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shane
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
>>>> on behalf of Shane Alexander <shane_alexan...@hotmail.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 17 March 2017 10:51 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agree getting WUA updated would be a good place to start, then you have
>>>> a known baseline for scanning against.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thing is, latest unique individual update for the WUA on W7 SP1 is
>>>> KB3138612 from March 2016.
>>>>
>>>> The Convenience Rollup Update actually has a newer WUA in it, and after
>>>> that WUA, e.g. from June 2016 onwards, the WUA is updated as it is included
>>>> in the Monthly Update Rollups
>>>>
>>>> Versions below.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.potentengineer.com/windows-update-agent-build-num
>>>> bers-for-windows-7/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agree that installing Convenience Rollup Update KB3125574 on all
>>>> existing W7 SP1's would create a good known baseline and then you can patch
>>>> from there onwards, like with IE, .Net, & Monthly Rollups.
>>>>
>>>> Something to note is the "Known issues" listed in KB3125574, you can
>>>> stop most of the issues before installing KB3125574.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding installing KB3125574 as an Update (through Software Updates
>>>> vs as an Apllication), you'd have to import KB3125574 directly into your
>>>> top WSUS (yes WSUS), and ensure you are sync'ing for the "Updates"
>>>> Classification, and ensure a full sync is done.
>>>>
>>>> You'll also then have many individual updates appearing as Superseded
>>>> (a good thing).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shane
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
>>>> on behalf of Sherry Kissinger <sherrylkissin...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, 17 March 2017 4:36 AM
>>>> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching
>>>>
>>>> Todd has a very good point:  windows update agent--if they haven't been
>>>> patching, they possibly haven't been paying attention to their windows
>>>> update agent version.  There are some updates which just don't install or
>>>> detect correctly unless you have the latest WUA.  So research what versions
>>>> of that you have out there, and get that to the latest version; otherwise
>>>> you might be chasing patching installation issues that end up being "latest
>>>> wua required"
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nope.  Just me, myself, and I.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought you were with tanium?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Daniel Ratliff <dratl...@humana.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why deploy the convenience rollup as an Application? Why not an
>>>>>>> update?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Daniel Ratliff*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
>>>>>>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 16, 2017 10:07 AM
>>>>>>> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com; Patch Management Mailing List <
>>>>>>> patchmanagem...@listserv.patchmanagement.org>
>>>>>>> *Subject:* [mssms] Catching up on patching
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A hypothetical scenario for you that I am actually facing, assuming
>>>>>>> Windows 7 SP1:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would you do if you came into an environment where patching was
>>>>>>> sparse and erratic over the past few years and documentation and 
>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>> knowledge was uncertain?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was thinking about deploying the Convenience Roll-up as an
>>>>>>> Application in ConfigMgr.  After that is complete create a Software 
>>>>>>> Update
>>>>>>> Group for the roll-ups since then.  After that, create the monthly ADRs 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> stay compliant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that sound like a good plan or would you guys attack it in a
>>>>>>> different manner?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
>>>>>>> entity to which it is addressed
>>>>>>> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
>>>>>>> material/information in error,
>>>>>>> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the
>>>>>>> material/information.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Sherry Kissinger
>>>>
>>>> My Parameters:  Standardize. Simplify. Automate
>>>> Blogs: http://www.mofmaster.com, http://mnscug.org/blogs/sherry
>>>> -kissinger, http://www.smguru.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to