�iogo Sperb Schneider gravada:
> You just made me remember about something I've been
> thinking... Is there somebody writing all this stuff
> we discover? It should be documented that the DDX disk
> interfaces look for DDXDOS.SYS and COMANDO.COM instead
> of MSXDOS.SYS and COMMAND.COM now that I painfully
> found about that. :)
This is not 100% correct. I have DDX, DMX, Sharp,
CDX-2 and CIEL disk drive interfaces and I use all of them
with MSXDOS.SYS and COMMAND.COM
Here in Brazil we had DDXDOS, SOLXDOS, HB-DOS, TPXDOS,
COBRADOS, and some other rips of MSXDOS.
If you format a disk with DDXDOS, then it modifies
the bootsector to search for DDXDOS.SYS and COMANDO.COM in
the directory... But the change is in the BOOTSECTOR and not
in the diskrom Interface.
As I said I have several REAL MSX disk drive interfaces
and all of them boot normally with MSXDOS.SYS and
COMMAND.COM
[]s
Werner
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
