On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 06:20:26PM +0100, Marco Ahrendt wrote:
> hi list,
>
> I searched the archive for any clues for this issue:
> adding a headerfield for the importance of a mail. is there any patch
> out yet? I found the ! flag in mutt but why does this flag isnīt set
> automatic if the mail contains "Priority: Urgent" or "Importance: High"?
> in another mail Iīd found:
>
> > > A hint from the originator to the Importance: RFC 1327 and
> > > recipients about how important a RFC 1911,
> > > message is. Values: High, normal experimental
> > > or low. Not used to control
> > > transmission speed.
>
> seems like this field is valid. how about hacking a new feature in mutt?
I'd like to decide for myself which emails that I consider important. The
important flag is highly misused by senders.
/magnus
--
http://x42.com/
