On 2001-05-11 13:21:40 -0400, adam morley wrote: >ah, if mutts not putting in the > right, then MUTT is what is >non-compliant, correct? i shouldn't have to make a vim macro to >fix mutt's non-compliance? It's configurable, and the mutt version you are using doesn't even claim that it's producing text/plain; format=flowed. -- Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
- Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Changing the ... Lawrence Mitchell
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... adam morley
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... adam morley
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... adam morley
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... Lawrence Mitchell
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... adam morley
- Re: Setting correct double-nested quotes (was: Chan... Madoka Machitani