On 2001-05-11 13:21:40 -0400, adam morley wrote:

>ah, if mutts not putting in the > right, then MUTT is what is 
>non-compliant, correct?  i shouldn't have to make a vim macro to 
>fix mutt's non-compliance?

It's configurable, and the mutt version you are using doesn't even 
claim that it's producing text/plain; format=flowed.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/

Reply via email to