(Neat feature: tagged reply) On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: > On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > I thought that > > > > > > message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle" > > > > > > would do the trick but Mutt says "pipe-message: unknown command". > > > > It's <pipe-message> (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? > > I've tried that too and Mutt doesn't like it either.
If you're trying to call a function you need to push or exec it onto the keyboard buffer ie. message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "push '<pipe-message>/usr/local/bin/unmangle<Return>'" (untested) or message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "exec pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle" (untested) Although the method I use is in the next message as works 100%: On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: > On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > I thought that > > > > > > message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle" > > > > > > would do the trick but Mutt says "pipe-message: unknown command". > > > > I would try > > message-hook . "unset display_filter" > > message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "set display_filter=/usr/local/bin/unmangle" > > > > but this is untested. > > Thanks, this works fine, at least for the viewing part of the > deal. I guess we need a reply_filter variable. -- Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg22068/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
